ACTUAL ISSUES OF REMOTE COURT HEARINGS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
نویسندگان
چکیده
The aim ofthe e‐Justice strategy isto improve the implementation of right to justice, cooperation between judicial authorities and effectiveness justice itself. Much attention has been paid computerization court proceedings. Remote hearings were recognized described in legal acts European Union Lithuania already at beginning second decade 21st century. However, this approach not widely used due technical problems insufficient regulation. Covid‐19 pandemic affected all life economy. In order preserve human interrupt work courts, remote held. It found that administrative especially when organizing quasi‐judicial structures, such can be applied almost without problems. Therefore, organization meetings courts organizations was continued during non‐ quarantine year, depending on wishes participants widespread use teleconferencing videoconferencing identified need Lithuania’s framework. article analyses peculiarities procedure
منابع مشابه
Dialogues in US Supreme Court Oral Hearings
Dialogue protocols in Artificial Intelligence and Law have become increasingly stylised, intended to examine the logic of particular legal phenomena such as burden of proof, rather than the procedures within which these phenomena occur. In this paper we will return to the original idea of using dialogue to model particular procedures by examining some very particular dialogues those found in or...
متن کاملEntrainment, dominance and alliance in supreme court hearings
A major goal of the Cognitive Infocommunication approach is to develop applications in which human and artificial cognitive systems are made to work more effectively. A critical step in this process is improving our understanding of human–human interaction so that it may be modeled more closely. Our work addresses this task by examining the role of entrainment – the propensity of conversational...
متن کاملThe Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law
Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...
متن کاملThe Remote Experiment Position in Actual Taxonomy
Taxonomy is a classification effort for establishment of learning/teaching operational objectives. There are some famous taxonomies, Bloom’s being the most quoted. In spite of the fact that some researchers have tried to explain the position of elearning in already known taxonomies, this subject was not too much in the general attention. In the paper the authors intend to go deeply and to analy...
متن کاملConfronting Government After Welfare Reform: Moralists, Reformers, and Narratives of (Ir)responsibility at Administrative Fair Hearings
Almost 40 years ago, the Supreme Court, in the landmark case Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), provided welfare participants with a potentially potent tool for challenging the government welfare bureaucracy by requiring pre-termination hearings before welfare benefits were discontinued or reduced. In 1996, with the passage of the Personal Responsibility Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta Prosperitatis
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1691-6077']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-7-23